'A mathematical model for the determination of total area under glucose tolerance and other metabolic curves'.

Which is all well and good however from the abstract:

OBJECTIVE–To develop a mathematical model for the determination of total

^{ }areas under curves from various metabolic studies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND^{ }METHODS–In Tai’s Model, the total area under a curve is computed by^{ }dividing the area under the curve between two designated values on the^{ }X-axis (abscissas) into small segments (rectangles and triangles) whose^{ }areas can be accurately calculated from their respective geometrical^{ }formulas.This sounds a lot like high school calculus to me. If you replace Metabolic curves with just curves then Dr Tai has stated the Trapezoidal rule one of the first techniques taught to calculate the integral (area under the curve). Which as we can see has many uses, not just total glucose tolerance. What is cheeky is the author has called it Tai's method, not the Leibniz or Newton method. Whats also impressive is that on google scholar the article has been cited 135 times. Which for published articles reproducing known mathematics is a lot. Scientist in some universities live and die professionally by the citations their articles garner. I am hoping this article is being cited as an example as why interdisciplinary studies are important.

It was Murray Gell-Mann who used the 'eight-fold way' (hippy) to explain the spectrum of hadrons (fancy word for subatomic particles like protons & neutrons). It was only after mixing with mathematicians, promptly pulled out 'Introduction to first group theory' that allowed Gell-Mann to open up symmetry and group theory to become one of the fundamental tools of particle physics. In his defense group theory wasn't taught in high school in the 1960s.

I don't mean to be snarky on Dr Tai, actually I do, but its probably because I am feeling a bit snarky about the whole 'science in society' thing at the moment. Especially after hearing the conversation of customer in front of me in the Australian geographic shop:

"excuse me why is this clock reading GMT what is that?"

"thats the Greenwich standard time to which we adjust our clocks"

"So thats the time in London is it?

"No, thats the time in Greenwich"

"Why whats so special about Greenwich"

of course I had no alternative but to beat them to death with a copy of Dava Sobel's Longitude.

Thought of you when I saw this. No idea why. *cough*

ReplyDeleteActually very good. Episode one at the bottom.

http://www.youtube.com/show/biteme?s=1

I heard on the radio some really daft talk about navigation in a Sydney-Hobart yacht race discussion. One numpty talked about navigation by the stars and how that means astrology is important. Then the tool dug a deeper hole by talking about star signs. Anyone got a gun and a good lawyer?

ReplyDeleteNice one Moko, Birmo is also digging biteme

ReplyDeleteTherbs

good lawyer ? perhaps a contradiction in terms perhaps you mean a competent lawyer.

Oh, good. It's not just us 'Merkins that are getting stoopider.

ReplyDeleteHappy New Year anyway.

Poor Barnes...

ReplyDeleteBarnes-Thanks so much for commenting on my television article I posted on that other site. You're too cool and awesomely supportive!!!

ReplyDeleteThey said "curves"

ReplyDeleteBarnes ... don't have your email ... you need to see this ... it has begun:

ReplyDeletehttp://gizmodo.com/5733025/watch-ibms-jeopardy+playing-computer-obliterate-humanitys-champions